Monday, August 3, 2009
Saturday, August 1, 2009
comment, Beck lawsuit, new wording for us
i left a comment ................
People who understand that 9/11 was a controlled demolition, per irrefutable scientific evidence, I think have no need, and should not sue others, critics, who do not understand ... let them have their freedom of speech .. once 9/11 facts will be recognized by public and by US government offcially, they may look at their judgement qualities... http://friendfeed.com/petrnews
................
sign up for web best commenting tools at
http://js-kit.com , http://disqus.com , http://intensedebate.com
http://js-kit.com , http://disqus.com , http://intensedebate.com
Please notice, Howard, yourself you are a master and concentrate on this ....
lets use, i propose, these words:
- I "UNDERSTAND" 9/11 Truth, or facts, rather then I/he/she "believes" this or that is true ....
- 9/11 "facts", rather than "truth", ... need to "recognize" the facts .. ///or, also with "truth"
Petr
bcc bl 911td - this means http://911TruthDavis.blogspot.com
note
nexo is not accepting emails anymore
wordpress is difficult to email to ... lets try it, as this is direct email, not forward or respond
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Christopher Maccarone <> wrote:
An interesting article from the disinfo site "Screw Loose Change"
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2009/07/who-is-gregory-louis-hoover.html
Thursday, July 23, 2009
Questions, arguments, Legislative meeting
Mark and David,
Now to answer to what you immediately brought back in and laid out for us.
2. Who might possess nanothermite in The USA in the first place?
good job and report, thanks!
Now to answer to what you immediately brought back in and laid out for us.
Lets keep it very simple - let's stick with ace issues - nano and WTC-7
- So, on Jim's "you have not convinced me" , or "you have no case", our answer might ought to be:
2. It's not enough to say "you are not convinced". Would you care to explain why not?
3. What would convince you if not a definitive scientific evidence?
4. Do you believe even that nanothermite was found in the cloud, as we presented?
5. Do you believe that implosion of WTC-7 was never explained?
6. Don't we all, after learning about nanothermite, have a duty to investigate, to learn the truth?
/Little tougher lines, but that is intentional/
That said, Hank wisely pointed out that the answer is, and will be, per default "not convinced" ... The issue is of tremendous repercussions.
It is also practically as if we would ask him to quit his job, and join our movement. .... I don't think Jim is ready for that, or the time is ready .. not yet ....... It's that chipping away, gathering of the critical mass, of info, of presence for us, for now .... as Hank mentioned
It's also time for us to stick together.
- What do we want from Jim now?
2. Who might possess nanothermite in The USA in the first place?
3. Who, when and how set the nanothermite inside the towers WTC-1 and 2, which imploded and pulverized into pyroclastic dust of controlled demolition?
3. Who, when and how set the explosives inside WTC-7, which imploded and disappeared into a controlled demolition.?
- What new are we bringing?
This is a trick question. Lets NEVER stray from the clear irrefutable facts.
We do bring a new compelling testimony from leading FEMA photographer, mentioning his deep doubts about the official story.., but also
1. We bring renewed insistence on absolute definitive irrefutability and reliability of nanothermite scientific evidence, insistence that you reevaluate your position!
1. We bring renewed insistence on absolute definitive irrefutability and reliability of nanothermite scientific evidence, insistence that you reevaluate your position!
2. We would like to ask for Senators direct opinion, meeting.
3. We'd like to ask for Senator's support, would you help with the process of nomination for Nobel Peace Prize of several personalities and on behalf of the whole 9/11 movement
/if nothing, this might have a symbolic effect/
Petr
Nonethless, a pure existence of this meeting is a valuable success for Davis 911 Truth, and for the whole movement.
Mark, will you copy this our debate to Richard and Gregg?
I think we should ...
And, MS Office files changes tracking .. why not get everybody on Eterpad, or any other modern collaboration tool out there??.. well true, we haven't gotten the testing that far yet ..
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
9/11 Truth Davis, AE911Truth.org meet with Senator Feinstein Office Director Jim Molinari, San Francisco.
Today, July 21, 2009, representatives of Davis 9/11 Truth Mark Graham, Sacramento 9/11 Truth, David Kimball, and Dr Richard Gage and Gregg Roberts, one of authors of Nanothermite Report, both of http://AE911Truth.org fame, met in San Francisco with a representative of Sen Diane Feinstein office Jim Molinari.
The subject - 9/11 Truth, the investigation.
The parties exchanged views and information on the issue, appreciated each other approach.
The 9/11 Truth group handed over a copy of Harrit, Jones et al Nanothermite Report, among others.
The parties agreed to disagree, and to possibly meet on a later date again.
Petr Buben
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
FriendFeed.com/911Davis
