Prof Griffin, one of the 50 most influential persons in the world. New statesman article.

Prof Griffin,  http://911blogger.com/node/21468#comment-217988

Sir, thank you for standing tall for many years, carrying the banner of the 9/11Truth, for inspiring others. Together with others, and thank to you, the truth of the biggest event of the recent US history will not die. It will not go away either.

9/11 is a controlled demolition pretext for wars.

Yes, this New Statesman article is quite a nice accomplishment , a statement, as you say, that yourself, and us, "we are doing something right" for the 9/11 Truth.

9/11 Truth is hardly a " one of the most pernicious global myths".
It is, on the other hand, the most damning irrefutable truth, it is the force and argument which resolutely, single handily and terminally strikes at the core of world war empire forces.

Yourself, though, you are hardly a "high priest of Truther movement", in my eyes. You are, by all accounts, a Diligent Disciple, a Purveyor of Truth, Truth and nothing but the Truth.

You are a new statesman, in a way.
A person, for whom the truth matters the most. And this principle should go for the whole country as well. For the United States of America, which currently faces stark, yet clearest choice - either face, own up the truth, or perish, disintegrate, collapse under your own decaying weight.

You are helping your country to find again this sense, the sense of justice, duty and the principle, this lost compass of our history greatness.

You inspired many, allowing the movement to grow, and mature. Recently, a strong scientific wing came on to bear within the ranks of the world 9/11 Truth Controlled Demolition Peace and Justice Movement.

Supporting the Movement with the science view, Mr. Richard Gage, AIA, The Masonry Architector Magic Wizard of Truth, Dr. Jones, Tinkering Alchemyst, with a vice to look too independently into a microscope and read thermal spectrameters.

Also, a rambling foreigner, Prof Harrit, The Truth Fighting Don Trueadore.
Not to forget Dusting Art Lady Janette!

They brought us the world! - a 9/11 Controlled Demolition Nanothermite Report of 2009.

No, you are not a High Priest ......

Petr Buben
:]

How is that for a pernicious ending to a promising blog entry? :]

http://www.911blogger.com/node/21451
http://twitter.com/911news - http://911UnitedWeInvestigate.blogspot.com

September 11th, 2009 – 9/11 Controlled Demolition, Remembering, Questioning, Challenging - Continuity of Government | 911Blogger.com - Carol Brouillet

Wonderful article by Carol Brouillet, year 2009 9/11 great defining events, Oakland Film Festival 2009. Remembering, Questioning, Challenging - Continuity of Government. 


9/11 controlled demolition. Per irrefutable scientific evidence. 


Vicepresident, Legislators served with the nanothermite explosive evidence. Important 9/11 links.

September 11th, 2009 – Remembering, Questioning, Challenging - Continuity of Government | 911Blogger.com

My comments:

Thank you Carol for such a wonderful summary article on 9/11 Truth Great Patriotic Peace Movement, on it's big change, big, defining events year of 2009, and on 9/11 Truth Oakland Film Festival 9/11 2009.  


Good pointing out the biggest events of 2009 - Irrefutable evidence of nanothermite, appearances on official mainstream TVs of Messieurs Richard Gage, Prof Dr Steven Jones, David Griffin, TVs of Fox Fresno, Russian TV, and namely Denver Public Channel. 
Also appearances by our friend Prof Harrit on Danish TV-2.  


I think what should be mentioned here also is an important fact of serving US elected officials with the Movement Defining Paper of 2009 Controlled Demolition Nanothermite Report by Prof Harrit, Dr. Jones and the team. 


Served were many Legislators, but also VicePresident Joseph Biden, Whitehouse press secretary, and others. 
See mainly http://wacla.org.  



Now it is a civic and law duty of all served, and all who know, to call for, or initiate, an investigation, lest verging on dereliction of duty, of conscience, of both, or even worse. 


The language of law for a treason commission is quite clear.  



On Van Jones, I think it is good it has been revealed he sign a call for new 9/11 investigation in 2004. 
He himself resigned, citing the cause of not being a distraction to a democratically elected president Obama. 
He is man and can take nicely any critique from the right with propagandists.  


Let's welcome Van into more active role for 9/11 Truth Movement.  


I do not think "hit" pieces in official media can hurt or reproach our movement one bit. 


Those are regime propagandists, indicting themselves with their lies and silly attempts to cover the truth, crawling on their knees in front of our Movement, in front of scientifically irrefutable truth.  

I think, lastly, that 2009 was a year the movement appeared on Twitter blog, to inform each other of what is going on.  


See http://twitter.com/911Blogger - http://twitter.com/AE911Truth - http://twitter.com/911Truth_org - http://twitter.com/stj911 - http://twitter.com/Demand911Truth - http://twitter.com/LooseChange911 - http://twitter.com/Visibility911 , to name a few. 


A summary channel is http://twitter.com/911news.  

I wish the 9/11 Great Patriotic Movement more great achievements in guarding the truth and peace in years to come ! :]  

http://911UnitedWeInvestigate.blogspot.com - http://friendfeed.com/petrbuben - http://friendfeed.com/911news

Davis 9/11 Truth member Jack Milton responding to recent 9/11 Van Jones article by Arianna Huffington on http://Huffpost.com

Ms. Huffington,

I have had great respect for you during your career and enjoyed your book "Fanatics & Fools."  I am not much of a blogger, and your guidelines might not allow this anyway, so I thought I would try to send this to you directly.

I am very disturbed by your statement:

--------

"I despise 9/11 'truther' conspiracies. Indeed, one of the guidelines for bloggers on HuffPost is a ban on posts putting forth those kinds of theories. And it was stupid of Van to put his name on a very stupid '9/11 Truth Statement.' I've spoken to Van. He doesn't believe that the Bush administration orchestrated the 9/11 attacks or allowed the attacks to happen in a cold-hearted attempt to gin up support. The 9/11 'Truthers' are fringe-dwellers and Van was completely wrong to allow himself to be associated with them."

--------

Many renowned professionals have expressed serious concerns about 9/11.  Indeed, 9/11 Commission members have said they were set up to fail, were refused critical information, etc.  Also, "no less than 60 per cent of the 9/11 commissioners have now publicly stated that the government agreed not to tell the truth about 9/11 and that the Pentagon was engaged in deliberate deception about their response to the attack" (see the reference below).  The Bush-Cheney conspiracy theory is full of gaping holes, but instead of relating to you many of the reasons to be very suspicious of the official conspiracy theory, let me simply quote Professor Lynn Margulis.  She is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and a recipient of the National Medal of Science, America's highest honor for scientific achievement.  She said the following:

--------
"The 9/11 tragedy is the most successful and most perverse publicity stunt in the history of public relations.  I arrive at this conclusion largely as the result of the research and clear writing by David Ray Griffin in his fabulous books about 9/11...  It is clear to me that David Ray Griffin and his fellow critics are correct: the 9/11 'new Pearl Harbor' was planned in astonishing detail and carried out through the efforts of a sophisticated and large network of operatives.  It was more complex and far more successful than the Allende assassination, the US bombing of our own ship the 'Maine' that began the Spanish-American war (and brought us Guam, Puerto Rico, Cuba, and the Philippines), the Reichstag fire that was used to justify the suspension of most civil liberties in Germany in the 1930's, and even Operation Himmler, which was used by Germany to justify the invasion of Poland, which started World War II.

Whoever is responsible for bringing to grizzly fruition this new false-flag operation, which has been used to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as unprecedented assaults on research, education, and civil liberties, must be perversely proud of their efficient handiwork...  I suggest that those of us aware and concerned demand that the glaringly erroneous official account of 9/11 be dismissed as a fraud and a new, thorough, and impartial investigation be undertaken."
--------

How can you possibly call Professor Margulis a fringe-dweller?  Note that she considers the official account of 9/11 to be a fraud.  It is baffling me why so many otherwise respected journalists have accepted this fraud so uncritically.

If you are at all open on this issue, and it seems that many people aren't, perhaps you might take a look at this page that just came to my attention, which outlines in a very interesting way some of the major concerns a lot of very thoughtful professionals and government officials have with the official story, which is very much a conspiracy theory itself.  The following account is fictitious, but a number of excellent points are made in an interesting way:

http://world911truth.org/charlie-sheen-20-minutes-with-the-president/

I am a professor of mathematics at a major university, and I can tell you that the scientific case against the three buildings having been brought down by planes and/or fire is very strong.  Actually, are you aware that no plane hit Building 7?  Disturbing scientific evidence is but one of many reasons that a new, thorough, and impartial investigation is so urgently needed.  And, the issue remains extremely important precisely because it was used to justify war and the assaults about which Professor Margulis speaks, which continue to this day and could get worse.

Many people just cannot bring themselves to entertain the idea that the official story about 9/11 might have significant problems and there could have been some sort of inside involvement.  They resolve this cognitive dissonance by just turning off to any information about the issues and attacking people who raise questions as "conspiracy theorists," a term that generally has very negative connotations.  This is easy for me to understand in many people, but I do not understand it in somebody who has been as thoughtful as you have on so many important issues.  Please inform yourself, then please consider revising your comments accordingly, and please help bring the media out of its stupor on this issue.  Thank you.

Jack Milton

Nano-thermite took down the WTC. 9/11 Controlled Demolition.

"THERE IS no doubt THAT 3 TOWERS WERE demolished ON 9/11 WTC"

"a masterpiece of demolition" - 9/11 science verdict

Comment: "9/11 Truthers Lament Bob Novak: First to Call Terrorist Attacks “an Inside Job”, Claimed Israel Behind Attacks". 9/11 controlled demolition

Good morning Debbie, thanks for calling me a "nutjob fan", inserting your remark directly into my comment. :]

However, let me clear my position on Robert Novak, who sadly perished lately of brain cancer, which led me to consider, how much of an influence years of intensive cellphone usage might have on brain cancer development, and lets mention Senator Kennedy and the same condition.

I do want to clarify that 9/11 Truth movement might be partly wrong on assessing what Bob Novak meant by "inside job". He meant "Arab terrorists" must have had, knowingly, some "inside connection", if they managed to hijack 4 airliners, none of which were intercepted, as it was on a day when all but 1 North American Air Defense fighter jets were "out of the area", participating in an exercise "to train for the event of airplanes being flown into buildings", to quote.

He meant "Arab terrorists" must have had - knowingly - a well placed accomplice, to be able to pull this off.

As nanotermite high military explosive was found all over the place, and as TV footage and pictures suggest without doubt, that 9/11 is a controlled demolition attack event, pulverization implosion of 2 towers, both falling somehow exactly same way, with a speed close to free fall, 10 floors per second disappeared in front of our eyes.

That is totally impossible to explain other than as explosive driven controlled demolition. Per irrefutable scientific evidence, and per common sense of impartial observers - those you call nutjobs, as they defy your ideology, and would, and will, redefine your political allegiance to whatever your Republican government tells you is true, nomatter if it defied the laws of nature, physics and common sense.

Brainwashed complacency and dedication to war nationalistic pride is a tough nut to crack. :].

It happened yes exactly to Germans, mass admiring Hitler, after he too burned down Reichstag, German parliament, to be able to accuse his enemies, to institute more police regime state, to go to war.

So, Bob Novak did NOT mean that "Arab terrorist" will have had, UNknowingly, "an inside connection", an entity who knew, who not only let it happen, but who made it happen - a false flag Reichstag fire inside job pretext of war self inflicted wound type of operation, to rally the nation to war.

They made it happen good.

Have you noticed? :]

Thank you,
Sincerely,
Petr Buben http://911IrrefutableEvidence.blogspot.com - http://911Investigate.blogspot.com

9/11 Truthers Lament Bob Novak: First to Call Terrorist Attacks “an Inside Job”, Claimed Israel Behind Attacks

comment, Beck lawsuit, new wording for us

i left a comment ................

People who understand that 9/11 was a controlled demolition, per irrefutable scientific evidence, I think have no need, and should not sue others, critics, who do not understand ... let them have their freedom of speech .. once 9/11 facts will be recognized by public and by US government offcially, they may look at their judgement qualities... http://friendfeed.com/petrnews

................

sign up for web best commenting tools at
http://js-kit.com , http://disqus.com , http://intensedebate.com 

Please notice, Howard, yourself you are a master and concentrate on this ....

lets use, i propose, these words:

• I "UNDERSTAND" 9/11 Truth, or facts, rather then I/he/she "believes" this or that is true ....
• 9/11 "facts", rather than "truth", ... need to "recognize" the facts .. ///or, also with "truth" 

Petr

bcc bl 911td - this means http://911TruthDavis.blogspot.com

ffd - http://friendfeed.com/911Davis

note

nexo is not accepting emails anymore

wordpress is difficult to email to ... lets try it, as this is direct email, not forward or respond 

http://911TruthDavis.wordpress.com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Christopher Maccarone <> wrote:

An interesting article from the disinfo site "Screw Loose Change"

http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2009/07/who-is-gregory-louis-hoover.html