Prof Griffin, one of the 50 most influential persons in the world. New statesman article.

Prof Griffin,  http://911blogger.com/node/21468#comment-217988

Sir, thank you for standing tall for many years, carrying the banner of the 9/11Truth, for inspiring others. Together with others, and thank to you, the truth of the biggest event of the recent US history will not die. It will not go away either.

9/11 is a controlled demolition pretext for wars.

Yes, this New Statesman article is quite a nice accomplishment , a statement, as you say, that yourself, and us, "we are doing something right" for the 9/11 Truth.

9/11 Truth is hardly a " one of the most pernicious global myths".
It is, on the other hand, the most damning irrefutable truth, it is the force and argument which resolutely, single handily and terminally strikes at the core of world war empire forces.

Yourself, though, you are hardly a "high priest of Truther movement", in my eyes. You are, by all accounts, a Diligent Disciple, a Purveyor of Truth, Truth and nothing but the Truth.

You are a new statesman, in a way.
A person, for whom the truth matters the most. And this principle should go for the whole country as well. For the United States of America, which currently faces stark, yet clearest choice - either face, own up the truth, or perish, disintegrate, collapse under your own decaying weight.

You are helping your country to find again this sense, the sense of justice, duty and the principle, this lost compass of our history greatness.

You inspired many, allowing the movement to grow, and mature. Recently, a strong scientific wing came on to bear within the ranks of the world 9/11 Truth Controlled Demolition Peace and Justice Movement.

Supporting the Movement with the science view, Mr. Richard Gage, AIA, The Masonry Architector Magic Wizard of Truth, Dr. Jones, Tinkering Alchemyst, with a vice to look too independently into a microscope and read thermal spectrameters.

Also, a rambling foreigner, Prof Harrit, The Truth Fighting Don Trueadore.
Not to forget Dusting Art Lady Janette!

They brought us the world! - a 9/11 Controlled Demolition Nanothermite Report of 2009.

No, you are not a High Priest ......

Petr Buben
:]

How is that for a pernicious ending to a promising blog entry? :]

http://www.911blogger.com/node/21451
http://twitter.com/911news - http://911UnitedWeInvestigate.blogspot.com

sarcasm .......Re: A sudden outbreak of domestic terror threats

good :]

because I think gentlemen took it from different angles, and it got a little bit confusing

so let me develop a bit.

1. to prevent terrorism, DO NOT OCCUPY foreign lands. do not bomb them apart. its very costly, wrong and unnecessary ..

US conquers (should 'conquer') other countries via peaceful means exclusively - economic, ideas might.

2. it is practically impossible to guard against terrorism, in a time when a bag of powder will kill the whole town, millions, a briefcase will nuke to whole small region, millions .... when people decide on suicides

3. lets get rid of DHS, Patriot act ... yes, as soon as Bush wars are spent, and Islam understands that USA is no more a colonial conquering power

Lastly, even if we have Cia staffed "Qaeda sleeper cells", sting operations, inactive bombs, undercover agents inviting people to "place a bomb and detonate it", the MOST important is, that NOTHING DETONATES ....

not like 9/11. they just took it too far.

agree?

Petr

ps

while it might have been wishful thinking on Arab fighters to ram airplanes into buildings in the USA, they would have NEVER succeeded, should US gov structures not have taken over the operation and carried it out.

http://twitter.com/Demand911Truth - http://twitter.com/911Truth - http://friendfeed.com/911Truth

http://friendfeed.com/petrbuben

bcc

to http://911TruthDavis.blogspot.com, http://911TruthDavis.wordpress.com - http://friendfeed.com/911TruthDavis

Yes, Petr, I was using sarcasm.

On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 10:18 AM,

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/20090925/ts_ynews/ynews_ts924

Thank God we have the Patriot Act and the DHS to protect us from all these bad guys!

September 11th, 2009 – 9/11 Controlled Demolition, Remembering, Questioning, Challenging - Continuity of Government | 911Blogger.com - Carol Brouillet

Wonderful article by Carol Brouillet, year 2009 9/11 great defining events, Oakland Film Festival 2009. Remembering, Questioning, Challenging - Continuity of Government. 


9/11 controlled demolition. Per irrefutable scientific evidence. 


Vicepresident, Legislators served with the nanothermite explosive evidence. Important 9/11 links.

September 11th, 2009 – Remembering, Questioning, Challenging - Continuity of Government | 911Blogger.com

My comments:

Thank you Carol for such a wonderful summary article on 9/11 Truth Great Patriotic Peace Movement, on it's big change, big, defining events year of 2009, and on 9/11 Truth Oakland Film Festival 9/11 2009.  


Good pointing out the biggest events of 2009 - Irrefutable evidence of nanothermite, appearances on official mainstream TVs of Messieurs Richard Gage, Prof Dr Steven Jones, David Griffin, TVs of Fox Fresno, Russian TV, and namely Denver Public Channel. 
Also appearances by our friend Prof Harrit on Danish TV-2.  


I think what should be mentioned here also is an important fact of serving US elected officials with the Movement Defining Paper of 2009 Controlled Demolition Nanothermite Report by Prof Harrit, Dr. Jones and the team. 


Served were many Legislators, but also VicePresident Joseph Biden, Whitehouse press secretary, and others. 
See mainly http://wacla.org.  



Now it is a civic and law duty of all served, and all who know, to call for, or initiate, an investigation, lest verging on dereliction of duty, of conscience, of both, or even worse. 


The language of law for a treason commission is quite clear.  



On Van Jones, I think it is good it has been revealed he sign a call for new 9/11 investigation in 2004. 
He himself resigned, citing the cause of not being a distraction to a democratically elected president Obama. 
He is man and can take nicely any critique from the right with propagandists.  


Let's welcome Van into more active role for 9/11 Truth Movement.  


I do not think "hit" pieces in official media can hurt or reproach our movement one bit. 


Those are regime propagandists, indicting themselves with their lies and silly attempts to cover the truth, crawling on their knees in front of our Movement, in front of scientifically irrefutable truth.  

I think, lastly, that 2009 was a year the movement appeared on Twitter blog, to inform each other of what is going on.  


See http://twitter.com/911Blogger - http://twitter.com/AE911Truth - http://twitter.com/911Truth_org - http://twitter.com/stj911 - http://twitter.com/Demand911Truth - http://twitter.com/LooseChange911 - http://twitter.com/Visibility911 , to name a few. 


A summary channel is http://twitter.com/911news.  

I wish the 9/11 Great Patriotic Movement more great achievements in guarding the truth and peace in years to come ! :]  

http://911UnitedWeInvestigate.blogspot.com - http://friendfeed.com/petrbuben - http://friendfeed.com/911news

Davis 9/11 Truth members Alex and Chris do freeway blogging, 8th anniversary, Berkeley.

Alex and Chris, with a group of
other activits, were demonstrating, showing banners at a Berkeley, Ca I-80 overpass, from 9- 6 pm.

Goog job in spreading the word about 9/11 Truth - the controlled demolition.

Davis 9/11 Truth group Sept 11, 2009 8 years anniversary Freeway Banner Blogging

The action took place on Sept 11, 2009, around noon, being prepared and organized by Mark Graham.
Petr Buben from Davis 9/11 Truth and Bob from Sacramento 9/11 Truth group took part. http://sac911truth.blogspot.com/

We displayed a banner “ 9/11 was created by US gov to manipulate us into a war.” Text and banner courtesy of Mark.

Highway Patrol and Davis Police officers were really fair, explained the conditions under which we can stay.
Our banner, as we were told by police, being read by drivers, of which about 10-20% honked, 2 showed finger, started to significantly slow down the highway I-80 in Davis, Pole Line overpass, up to 15 mph, and standstill at one point. 

Shortly thereafter, we decided to wrap the action up and leave, which was appreciated by Davis Police officer.

The aims of demonstrating the 9/11 controlled demolition truth, educating people and discussing the topic ourselves and with others, were achieved.

One gentleman, former marine, came by, said he turned back couple miles just to talk to us and dispute what we believe in. We did fully engage him – in a friendly animated argument.

Mark also successfully distributed several http://ae911truth.org/ facts cards.

Footage and pictures later, Mark is editing them.

We are a small town, but the freeway was ours to cover with information that day.

http://911blogger.com/ – http://911truth.org/

Davis 9/11 Truth founding member Mark Graham appeals to US Rep Mike Thompson, D - Ca, to initiate new 9/11 controlled demolition investigation.

Mark called Thompson’s DC office on Sept 11, 20009, and asked for an investigation of 9/11 inside job unanswered questions, specifically the fact that nanothermite being discovered in the WTC dust.
The office took the call, recorded the information and promised to relay the message to Rep Mike Thompson himself.
http://mikethompson.house.gov/ , California 1st District

Davis 9/11 Truth member Jack Milton responding to recent 9/11 Van Jones article by Arianna Huffington on http://Huffpost.com

Ms. Huffington,

I have had great respect for you during your career and enjoyed your book "Fanatics & Fools."  I am not much of a blogger, and your guidelines might not allow this anyway, so I thought I would try to send this to you directly.

I am very disturbed by your statement:

--------

"I despise 9/11 'truther' conspiracies. Indeed, one of the guidelines for bloggers on HuffPost is a ban on posts putting forth those kinds of theories. And it was stupid of Van to put his name on a very stupid '9/11 Truth Statement.' I've spoken to Van. He doesn't believe that the Bush administration orchestrated the 9/11 attacks or allowed the attacks to happen in a cold-hearted attempt to gin up support. The 9/11 'Truthers' are fringe-dwellers and Van was completely wrong to allow himself to be associated with them."

--------

Many renowned professionals have expressed serious concerns about 9/11.  Indeed, 9/11 Commission members have said they were set up to fail, were refused critical information, etc.  Also, "no less than 60 per cent of the 9/11 commissioners have now publicly stated that the government agreed not to tell the truth about 9/11 and that the Pentagon was engaged in deliberate deception about their response to the attack" (see the reference below).  The Bush-Cheney conspiracy theory is full of gaping holes, but instead of relating to you many of the reasons to be very suspicious of the official conspiracy theory, let me simply quote Professor Lynn Margulis.  She is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and a recipient of the National Medal of Science, America's highest honor for scientific achievement.  She said the following:

--------
"The 9/11 tragedy is the most successful and most perverse publicity stunt in the history of public relations.  I arrive at this conclusion largely as the result of the research and clear writing by David Ray Griffin in his fabulous books about 9/11...  It is clear to me that David Ray Griffin and his fellow critics are correct: the 9/11 'new Pearl Harbor' was planned in astonishing detail and carried out through the efforts of a sophisticated and large network of operatives.  It was more complex and far more successful than the Allende assassination, the US bombing of our own ship the 'Maine' that began the Spanish-American war (and brought us Guam, Puerto Rico, Cuba, and the Philippines), the Reichstag fire that was used to justify the suspension of most civil liberties in Germany in the 1930's, and even Operation Himmler, which was used by Germany to justify the invasion of Poland, which started World War II.

Whoever is responsible for bringing to grizzly fruition this new false-flag operation, which has been used to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as unprecedented assaults on research, education, and civil liberties, must be perversely proud of their efficient handiwork...  I suggest that those of us aware and concerned demand that the glaringly erroneous official account of 9/11 be dismissed as a fraud and a new, thorough, and impartial investigation be undertaken."
--------

How can you possibly call Professor Margulis a fringe-dweller?  Note that she considers the official account of 9/11 to be a fraud.  It is baffling me why so many otherwise respected journalists have accepted this fraud so uncritically.

If you are at all open on this issue, and it seems that many people aren't, perhaps you might take a look at this page that just came to my attention, which outlines in a very interesting way some of the major concerns a lot of very thoughtful professionals and government officials have with the official story, which is very much a conspiracy theory itself.  The following account is fictitious, but a number of excellent points are made in an interesting way:

http://world911truth.org/charlie-sheen-20-minutes-with-the-president/

I am a professor of mathematics at a major university, and I can tell you that the scientific case against the three buildings having been brought down by planes and/or fire is very strong.  Actually, are you aware that no plane hit Building 7?  Disturbing scientific evidence is but one of many reasons that a new, thorough, and impartial investigation is so urgently needed.  And, the issue remains extremely important precisely because it was used to justify war and the assaults about which Professor Margulis speaks, which continue to this day and could get worse.

Many people just cannot bring themselves to entertain the idea that the official story about 9/11 might have significant problems and there could have been some sort of inside involvement.  They resolve this cognitive dissonance by just turning off to any information about the issues and attacking people who raise questions as "conspiracy theorists," a term that generally has very negative connotations.  This is easy for me to understand in many people, but I do not understand it in somebody who has been as thoughtful as you have on so many important issues.  Please inform yourself, then please consider revising your comments accordingly, and please help bring the media out of its stupor on this issue.  Thank you.

Jack Milton